modality

Open and Extremity MRI

Specialty MRI configurations that serve populations and use cases that whole-body closed-bore 1.5 T / 3 T MRI doesn't:

Open MRI

Why open MRI exists

Claustrophobia affects ~10-15% of MRI patients, of whom a meaningful fraction cannot complete a closed-bore scan even with sedation. Open MRI sacrifices field strength (hence image quality) for patient acceptance. Also important for:

Field strength trade-off

At 1.5 T, SNR scales favorably with scan time — modern techniques produce excellent images. At 0.3 T (typical open MRI field), SNR is ~1/5 that of 1.5 T. Sequence times lengthen; certain applications (diffusion, spectroscopy, perfusion) are difficult or impossible. Routine anatomy is still diagnostic-quality, just not premium.

Systems

Extremity MRI

Clinical niche

Dedicated extremity MRI fits in an orthopedic office or outpatient suite without the infrastructure of whole-body MRI:

Systems

Image quality

At 0.3 T with dedicated coils tuned to small FOV, extremity MRI produces clinically adequate images for knee internal derangement, ankle ligament, wrist TFCC + carpal bones, elbow. Not equivalent to 3 T whole-body for cartilage-detail work, but adequate for most clinical indications.

Weight-bearing MRI

Esaote G-scan Brio + similar tilt-magnet scanners acquire images with the patient in a loaded / standing / sitting position. Relevant for:

Niche clinical application; limited adoption but distinctive capability.

Systems

Regulatory

Lower-field MRI has fewer safety considerations than 3 T:

Related